Story ಹುಡುಕು Huduku Search and read on your own terms.
← Story

ಹುಡುಕು Huduku · Friday, 6 November 2026

Reading the news: a worksheet

One story, as each outlet headlined it. Read the headlines, then work through the questions.

ED attaches Azam Khan’s Jauhar University assets worth Rs 1,170 crore in money laundering case

8 reports from 8 outlets over 14 hours. Those outlets have 7 owners.

  • Business Today and India Today have the same owner: India Today Group.

How each outlet put it

Highlighted: words only this outlet used

Most outlets used: attaches, ED, Jauhar, University, Azam, Khan

  1. Times of India
    ED attaches Azam Khan’s Jauhar University assets worth Rs 1,170 crore in money laundering case
  2. The Indian Express News
    ED attaches Jauhar University land, buildings in money-laundering case
  3. Business Today
    Major action against Azam Khan: ED attaches Jauhar University assets worth Rs 1,170 crore

    Words only this outlet used: Major action.

  4. Hindustan Times
    Money laundering case: ED attaches Azam Khan’s Jauhar University assets worth ₹1,170 cr

    Words only this outlet used: cr.

  5. India Today changed
    ED attaches SP leader Azam Khan's Rs 1,170-crore Jauhar University in UP

    Words only this outlet used: SP leader.

    Earlier headline ED attaches SP leader Azam Khan's Rs 1,170 crore Jauhar University in UP · change seen 28 Oct, 11:35 pm?

  6. NDTV
    Probe Agency Attaches Jauhar University' Rs 1,170-Crore Assets In Azam Khan Case

    Words only this outlet used: Probe Agency.

  7. The Hindu News
    ED attaches land, buildings of Mohammad Ali Jauhar University in Rampur in money laundering case

    Words only this outlet used: Mohammad Ali, Rampur.

  8. The New Indian Express
    ED attaches Azam Khan varsity land & buildings in money laundering case

    Words only this outlet used: varsity.

Questions

  1. Which words do most headlines share? Which words does only one outlet use, and what do they stress?

  2. Who reported it first, and how long did the others take? Does “first seen by Huduku” mean they broke the story?

  3. How many different owners carried it? Do any outlets share an owner, or nearly the same words?

  4. Which outlets you know did not carry it? What might explain that?

  5. What is the original source (a judgment, notice, speech or set of figures)? Find it. Does any headline say more than the source does?

  6. If you shared one of these headlines, which would it be, and why?

Trace it to the source?

Stories like this usually start from a document. These are where such documents are published; none is matched to this story.

Each headline links to the outlet’s own report. Huduku shows headlines only. https://huduku.org/story/8850